Cluster by mechanism
Relate duplicate-draft cases to the same retry transition, while retaining individual run evidence.
FlakeMap Trust Report / Proposed module 05
Keep the
why.
Group related failures and keep the artifact, source, reviewer, and explanation together. Make disagreement and unresolved evidence visible.
FAILURE CLUSTER / 01Duplicate after retrySeeds 104 + 108 · two linked artifact pairs
DEMO — SYNTHETIC DATA
The question this module answers
Can another engineer understand the decision?
- Input
- Failing runs and their source artifacts
- Output
- A human-reviewed failure record
Preserve the context
Keep timestamps, ownership, criterion, and source references legible.
Leave a review trail
Separate pending, blocked, reviewed, and resolved mock states rather than silently marking every item complete.
Follow the proposed workflow
A visible path from
input to decision.
01
Open a failure cluster
Failing runs and their source artifacts
Proposed process / synthetic exampleModule boundaries
Useful evidence.
Honest limits.
Is Trust Report live?
This module is available to explore in the synthetic demo. A first pilot would test one scoped module with approved fixtures.
What does the demo execute?
It selects deterministic stub fixtures and changes local mock states. It does not call models, write to tools, import customer traces, or modify CI.
How is value validated?
Compare with the existing eval gate and confirm a meaningful missed regression independently. A named engineering owner must commit a gate or fund a trial before expansion.
A smaller test. A clearer decision.
Start with the workflow
you can’t afford to guess.
Agree on one task criterion, an approved fixture, and a named engineering owner.
Request a replay study