Commercial model / Test hypotheses

Start small.
Measure what matters.

These amounts are research hypotheses, not accepted prices or current offers. No payment, subscription, or active checkout is available.

Explore the study model↓

THE FOUR-WEEK STUDYPROPOSED SCOPE

WEEK 1 / Scope

One workflow. One task criterion.

Agree on the fixture, owner, and success condition.

One shared readout. A concrete next step.

Proposed initial engagement

Replay study

$3,000/ four weeks

Pricing test hypothesis

A bounded investigation around one agreed workflow, a task-level criterion, and an engineering owner.

Approved, redacted fixture set
Baseline and candidate comparison
Controlled failure conditions
Human-reviewed evidence readout
Recommendation on next gate experiment

Scope a replay study

Possible expansion

Recurring lab

$1,200/ month + metered runs

Pricing test hypothesis

Recurring team QA, CI governance, and production sampling are possible directions after meaningful demand is confirmed.

Unit of value still to be interviewed
Runs, workload, or seats not settled
Evaluation costs need scoping
No usage limits or SLA established

See the validation threshold

Price follows
an owned question.

What is included in the $3,000 hypothesis?

A proposed four-week, bounded replay study. Exact workload, run count, data handling, and deliverables need agreement; it is not an active offer.

Who owns the trial?

The AI engineering lead owns the release criterion; QA/evaluation champions the evidence; the engineering VP owns the trial budget.

When would recurring usage make sense?

After the study confirms incremental value beyond existing tools and a team commits a real gate or funds a trial. Recurring value and frequency remain unverified.

A smaller test. A clearer decision.

Start with the workflow
you can’t afford to guess.

Agree on one task criterion, an approved fixture, and a named engineering owner.

Request a replay study

Start small.Measure what matters.